The 2025 IR-4 Food Use Workshop prioritizes new solutions for specialty crop growers

Growers and researchers prioritize new pest control options for the 2026 IR-4 field program.

Close-up of green hop cones hanging from a vine, surrounded by lush leaves, with rows of hop plants and trellis poles fading into the background under a bright blue sky with scattered clouds.
Photo by Pixabay

The IR-4 Project helps specialty crop growers gain access to pest management tools so they can produce healthy, abundant harvests and increase their profitability. Specialty crops include fruits, vegetables, herbs, nuts and other food crops, as well as flowers, shrubs and landscape plants—all of which are vital to public wellbeing.

The crop protection industry generally focuses their efforts on major crops, leaving specialty crop growers with fewer tools to effectively manage pests. The IR-4 Project develops data necessary for the registration of safe and effective pest management solutions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). IR-4 also supports the registration of specialty uses on major crops such as corn, soybeans and cotton.

Since 1963, the IR-4 Project has been instrumental in delivering pest management solutions to specialty crop growers by developing research data to support new EPA tolerances and labeled product uses. IR-4’s food crop research cycle is unique in that it invites all stakeholders to the table through the annual Food Use Workshop. The 2025 meeting took place Sept. 9-11 in Denver, Colorado, where participants worked together to hone a long list of requested projects down to a fundable number of projects.

At the 2025 Food Use Workshop, research priorities for the 2026 field program were selected; projects prioritized fruits, vegetables, nuts, field and oil crops, herbs and other crops in the United States and Canada. Approximately 131 people attended the three-day meeting (99 in person and 32 virtually), including specialty crop researchers, extension specialists, representatives of commodity and industry groups across the country, personnel from EPA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, IR-4, the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada that conducts Canadian counterpart of minor use program, and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency, the Canadian counterpart of U.S. EPA.

Representing Michigan’s fruit and vegetable interests, the workshop was attended by Michigan State University’s Mary Hausbeck, Timothy Miles, Joshua Miranda, Nicole Soldan, Celeste Wheeler and Amber DeVisser. Representing a Michigan growers’ group was Pete Nelson of the Cherry Marketing Institute. Also representing the IR-4 North Central Region was Daniel Heider of Wisconsin, Allison Robinson of Ohio, Ramawater Yadav of Ohio, Ashley Leach of Ohio, Andres Sanabria-Velazquez of Ohio, Richard Hack of Indiana, Govinda Shrestha of South Dakota, Ivair Valmorbida Missouri, Brian Jenks of North Dakota and Mohammad Babadoost of Illinois. Representing the North Central Region grower’s groups was Robert Kaldunski of Wisconsin Ginseng, Michelle Starke of Covercress, and Brent Bean and Ethan Triplett of Sorghum Checkoff.

The prioritization process focused on the most critical pest management needs from all regions and all disciplines for each commodity. Participants were provided a list of 248 pesticides nominated as “A” priorities prior to the Food Use Workshop. As a group, participants ranked products based on availability and efficacy of alternative pest management tools (including ongoing projects for the same need and resistance management), damage potential of target pests, performance and crop safety of the chemical in managing the target pests, compatibility of the proposed chemical candidate with integrated pest management, uses currently covered by Section 18 emergency exemptions, and harmonization implications due to lack of international maximum residue limits.

Based on projected budget appropriations for IR-4 in 2025, only 35 “A” priority projects throughout the disciplines were selected by consensus. An “A” priority triggers IR-4 to begin the field residue program during the following season and complete it within 30 months. The timeline will be shortened when IR-4 joins the company’s petition submission schedule with the expectation that a complete data package be submitted to the EPA in 16-24 months.

In addition to the above projects that require pesticide residue analysis under GLP, 13 “H+” (high priority plus) efficacy/crop safety projects have been selected, because potential registrants want to see efficacy data before IR-4 conducts full residue studies, or the registrant requires only efficacy data to expand their label to include a certain crop or pest.

Thirty-five projects important for Michigan and the North Central Region were selected at the 2025 Food Use Workshop (Tables 1 and .2).

The following new candidate priority “A” and “H+” projects listed were provided at the IR-4 national research planning meeting on Oct 27-29, 2025. A complete listing can be found on the 2025 IR-4 Food Use Workshop website.

Table 1. Priority "A" projects for North Central fruits and vegetables.

Group Commodity Chemical Reasons for Need
03-07A Onion (dry bulb) Pyraflufen-ethyl Control annual weeds in young onions
04-16A Spinach Metribuzin Crop rotation
04-16A Lettuce (greenhouse) Spidoxamat Aphid and whitefly control
06-22A Bean (snap) Isocycloseram (ISM-555) Seed corn maggot control
06-22CE Bean, lima (succulent and dried shelled) Metribuzin Crop rotation
06-22F Pea (dry) Topramezone Control of kochia and other broadleaf weeds
08-10A Tomato (field) Maleic hydrazide Broomrape control
08-10A Tomato (greenhouse) Diflubenzuron Psyllid control
12-12A Cherry Flazasulfuron Control of annual broadleaf weeds, nutsedge, and annual grasses
12-12B Peach Flazasulfuron Control of annual broadleaf weeds, nutsedge, and annual grasses
12-12C Plum Flazasulfuron Control of annual broadleaf weeds, nutsedge, and annual grasses
13-07B Blueberry (highbush) Afidopyropen Aphid control
13-07F Grape Inpyrfluxam Black rot control
13-07G Strawberry (greenhouse transplant) Mandipropamid Phytophthora control for plants grown in greenhouse for sale to consumer
13-07G Strawberry (greenhouse) Spidoxamat Control of multiple arthropods
15-22B Buckwheat Quizalofop Control of grass weeds
15-22D Corn (sweet) Amicarbazone Weed control. Alternative to Atrazine
15-22E Sorghum (grain) Bifenthrin Chinch bug control
20B Safflower Topramezone Control of kochia and other broadleaf weeds
25AB Basil (greenhouse transplant) Mandipropamid Phytophthora control for plants grown in greenhouse for sale to consumer
25AB Mint (greenhouse transplant) Mandipropamid Phytophthora control for plants grown in greenhouse for sale to consumer
99 Field pennycress (oil seed) Clopyralid Weed control prior to crop emergence
99 Hops Fluoxapiprolin Control of hop downy mildew
99 Hops Afidopyropen Control of aphids and leafhoppers


Table 2. High priority needs for efficacy/crop safety projects for North Central fruits and vegetables.

Group Commodity Chemical Reasons for Need
01AB Beet (garden) Metamitron Control of pigweeds, lambsquarters, and other weeds
08-10A Tomato (greenhouse) Tiapyrachlor Control of aphids, whiteflies, and leafhoppers
08-10BC Pepper (greenhouse transplant) Tiapyrachlor Control of aphids, whiteflies, and leafhoppers
09B Cucumber Isocycloseram (ISM-555) Seed corn maggot control
13-07B Blueberry (highbush) Pyroxasulfone Control of broadleaf weeds, grasses, and nutsedge
20B Safflower Tiapyrachlor Control of lygus hesperus
13-07F Grape Epyrifenacil Control of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds
99 Honeybee Beauvaria bassiana Varroa mite control
01AB Radish Isocycloseram Cabbage maggot control
13-07B Blueberry Icafolin-methyl Control of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds
06-22BD Pea Isocycloseram Seed corn maggot control

Did you find this article useful?