Winter wheat response to nitrogen
Editor’s note: This article is from the archives of the MSU Crop Advisory Team Alerts. Check the label of any pesticide referenced to ensure your use is included.
Winter
wheat response to topdress application of nitrogen may vary from year
to year. Nitrogen response studies were conducted for three years at the
MSU Agronomy Farm on a Capac loam, south of the main campus. Some of
the variability in response is related to soil moisture status as it
affects N availability, and to N source. In 2004, “Hopewell” soft red
winter wheat responded well to nitrogen applied just prior to green-up
(Table 1). Broadcasting 60 lbs N/acre resulted in an 11 bushel per acre
increase. The yield difference between the 60 and 120 lbs N/acre rates
was not statistically different at the 90 percent confidence level, even
though the average yield was 7 bushels greater. Topdressing 60 lbs N/a
(total N applied was 85 lbs/a) resulted in the best combination for
economic return and minimum residual N in the soil. In that year, soil
moisture conditions turned dry after N application at the Feekes 6
stage. Therefore, splitting the N between green-up and Feekes 6 did not
prove beneficial (45+45 treatment).
In 2005, limited rain occurred in April and May, so movement of the
surface applied N into the soil and root zone was limited. Considerable
volatile N loss occurred from urea and UAN (28% liquid). Even so, the
yield increase with 60 lbs N/ a broadcast was similar to that in 2004
(12 bu/a). Where ammonium sulfate was the N source, little volatile N
loss occurred, and the yield with 90 lbs N/acre was 78.3 bu/a compared
to 64.3 bu/acre for urea or UAN. In 2006 soil moisture was good
throughout most of the spring/summer growing period, so considerable N
was released from the soil organic matter. Hence, response to applied N
was less. The variety “Roan” (grown in 2006) is a high yielder, but is
susceptible to lodging. Heavy rains and strong winds caused the wheat to
lodge about 3 weeks prior to maturity in all plots receiving 60 lbs or
more of N. The severe lodging probably moderated any potential yield
response to N rate. With urea and UAN applying 30 lbs N/acre resulted in
as good a yield as 90 lbs N/a either all prior to green-up or by split
application.
Interestingly, ESN (a controlled release polymer coated urea) applied at
green-up in 2006 to supply 30, 60 or 90 lbs N/acre resulted in less
severe lodging, and yields of 93.7, 106.1 and 105.7 bu/acre,
respectively. Perhaps this was related to the gradual release of
available N. In the dry spring of 2005, ESN applied to supply 60 and 90
lbs N/acre resulted in yields similar to those attained with ammonium
sulfate, and those yields were higher than yields attained with urea or
UAN. Apparently, with the warm dry soil conditions in 2005 there was
significant loss of N by volatilization from urea and UAN, which did not
occur with the polymer coated urea (ESN) or ammonium sulfate. Hence,
soil moisture and rainfall conditions can greatly influence the release
of N, and the loss of N from the various N sources.
Based on the results of these three years, it appears that wheat yield
response to nitrogen is influenced by a combination of weather and N
source. Under dry soil conditions the potential for volatile N loss is
greatest with urea and UAN. The risk of N loss can be moderated by
applying some of the N as ammonium sulfate or ESN. Across all the years,
topdressing 60 lbs N/a (total of 85 lbs N/a for the crop) as urea or
UAN resulted in near the best economic return. This was also the case
with ESN and ammonium sulfate in 2004 and 2006. With the dry spring of
2005 applying 90 lbs topdress (total of 115 lbs N/a) as Ammonium sulfate
or ESN resulted in a better economic yield. Using a combination of urea
or UAN with either ammonium sulfate or ESN prior to or near green-up to
supply 60 to 90 lbs N/a appears to be appropriate. This year with the
higher cost of N staying closer to the 60 lbs N/a topdress rate may
provide the best economic return. This assumes about 25 lbs N/a was
applied at planting last fall.
Table 1. Soft red winter wheat response to nitrogen rate topdressed near green-up.
Topdress |
Wheat Yield1 |
||||
N Rate |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||
lb N/a |
bu/acre |
||||
0 |
75.2 |
52.7 |
AS 2 |
88.4 |
ESN 2 |
30 |
- - |
- - |
(66.0) |
95.2 |
(93.7) |
60 |
86.1 |
64.6 |
(67.5) |
91.5 |
(106.1) |
90 |
89.4 |
64.3 |
(78.3) |
95.3 |
(105.7) |
120 |
93.4 |
- - |
- - |
||
45 + 45 UAN |
76.6 |
- - |
95.9 |
||
variety |
Hopewell |
Sisson |
Roan |