Restoration of Lake Trout in the Great Lakes: Challenges and Strategies for Future Management

January 1, 1995 - Charles C. Krueger; Michael L. Jones; William W. Taylor

Journal or Book Title: Journal of Great Lakes Research

Keywords: Genetics; Great Lakes; exotic species; habitat; rehabilitation; ecosystem management; public participation

Volume/Issue: 21 (Supplement 1)

Page Number(s): 547-558

Year Published: 1995

 

Rehabilitation of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) populations has shown many signs of success in Lake Superior, but few are apparent in Lakes Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario. This paper identifies key factors that have blocked rehabilitation and proposes management actions to address these problems based on the proceedings of the RESTORE Conference held in 1994. Important factors that have prevented restoration were the loss of native populations and their genetic variation, excessive fishing mortality, effects of non-native species, and degradation of habitat. Strategies proposed were conservation of remaining native populations in Lake Superior, introduction to the lower four lakes of lake trout that represent a broad range of genetic diversity, control of sea lamprey populations that use the St. Marys River, reduction of fishing mortality, re-introduction of native forage fish now extinct in some lakes, establishment of lake trout on off-shore spawning areas, and the creation of new spawning shoals. Socio-cultural issues identified were the need within management agencies to integrate lake trout rehabilitation programs into their fish community and ecosystem plans, the loss of managers' and biologists' knowledge because the program has spanned more than one human generation, and the loss of pHblic support for the program from stakeholder groups (e.g., some anglers and commercial fishing groups). Lessons applicable to restoration programs elsewhere were: (1) species are easiest to restore in ecosystems least disturbed, (2) new research information must be efficiently transferred from science to management, and (3) long-lived species pose unique ecological and socio-cultural problems for restoration programs.

 

Type of Publication: Journal Article

Authors

You Might Also Be Interested In

Accessibility Questions:

For questions about accessibility and/or if you need additional accommodations for a specific document, please send an email to ANR Communications & Marketing at anrcommunications@anr.msu.edu.

Tag List
  • center for systems integration and sustainability,
  • ecosystem management,
  • exotic species,
  • genetics,
  • great lakes,
  • habitat,
  • public participation,
  • rehabilitation
Michigan State University
  • Spartans Will.
  • © Michigan State University

MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer, committed to achieving excellence through a diverse workforce and inclusive culture that encourages all people to reach their full potential.

Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, religion, age, height, weight, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, family status or veteran status. Issued in furtherance of MSU Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Quentin Tyler, Director, MSU Extension, East Lansing, MI 48824. This information is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by MSU Extension or bias against those not mentioned.

The 4-H Name and Emblem have special protections from Congress, protected by code 18 USC 707.

We comply with the Federal Trade Commission 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).